Home

Unit 5: Advanced AI

5.1 This can't go on

5 minutes

0% · about 100 minutes left

The world economy has grown by roughly 2% a year for about two centuries. To anyone alive today, that feels like the normal state of things: each generation a bit richer than the last.

Holden Karnofsky argues that it is anything but normal. For most of human history, growth was close to zero. And it is easy to show that 2% a year cannot go on for very long, in historical terms.

Try it

Pick an annual growth rate and a number of years. How many times bigger would the world economy be?

%

Size of the economy compared with today

3.3 × 10⁷⁰

At 2% a year for 8,200 years, the economy would be about 3 × 10⁷⁰ times its current size. Karnofsky's comparison is that there are fewer than 10⁷⁰ atoms in our galaxy. That would mean multiple economies the size of today's world economy for every atom.

Source: Holden Karnofsky, "This Can't Go On", Cold Takes (2021), summarised

8,200 years sounds like a long time, but it is shorter than the time since humans began farming. The point isn't that growth will stop in 8,200 years. It is that the past two centuries are an anomaly, and anomalies end. Karnofsky sees three broad possibilities:

  • Stagnation. Growth slows to a crawl and stays there.
  • Explosion. Growth speeds up dramatically before hitting physical limits.
  • Collapse. War, pandemics or other catastrophes knock civilisation backwards.

Whichever happens, we are probably living through an unusual and unstable period, not a calm stretch of business as usual.

Karnofsky's wider argument is that advanced AI is the most likely route to the "explosion" scenario. Systems that could do the work of scientists and engineers could speed up research, including research on AI itself. This is why the rest of this unit is about AI.

Line chart of world economic output over 2,000 years, nearly flat until around 1800, then rising steeply.

This loads the chart from Our World in Data.

Almost all economic growth in history has happened in the past two centuries. Credit: Our World in Data, CC BY 4.0.

A caution. Economists point out that growth is measured in value, not atoms, so the comparison can be challenged. Growth could come from better ideas rather than more stuff. The argument's narrower claim is harder to dismiss: today's growth rates are historically recent, and assuming they will simply continue is itself a strong bet.

Tip: use the left and right arrow keys to move between lessons.