AI governance
Shaping the laws, institutions and norms around AI, in government, regulators, standards bodies and think tanks. See part 4.
Good fit if you like writing, people and politics, and can wait years for results.
AI is getting more capable fast. You can help it go well from here: in government, in research, or by starting something the field still lacks.
About 15 minutes to read. Written in 2023 from interviews with people in the field, updated November 2026.
At a glance
We've helped people into AI safety since we organised our first AI safety retreat in 2022.
AI systems are getting more capable quickly. METR found that the length of tasks AI agents can complete on their own has been doubling roughly every seven months. That could do enormous good, but it also brings serious risks: AI used for cyberattacks or to help build biological weapons, power concentrated in very few hands, and systems that act in ways their developers can't reliably oversee or control.
In 2023, hundreds of AI researchers and industry leaders signed a statement that reducing the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority. AI safety is the work of reducing these risks, especially the most severe ones, through technical research, governance and building the field. The Center for AI Safety has a readable overview of the risks.
It gives you the Dutch specifics. For the wider picture, read 80,000 Hours on AI careers and technical AI safety research. It's for students and people early in their careers, and for experienced professionals, whom the field especially needs.
Whatever path you consider, how well it suits you matters as much as the path itself. Our career guide shows how to test your fit cheaply.
Ask the people who fund AI safety what the field needs most, and many will say founders. Coefficient Giving, one of the largest funders in the field, says many critical problems have no one working on them, and launched Project Tailwind to find people to start new organisations. Catalyze Impact, which incubates AI safety organisations, says funders have set aside enough to build nonprofits worth $100 million or more.
The money is there. What's missing is people who can turn an idea into an organisation.
Funders are especially interested in people with strong technical ability, experience building complex or security-critical systems, machine learning research expertise, experience in auditing or red-teaming, a track record of founding or scaling companies, nonprofits or programmes, or a talent for communicating with technical and non-technical audiences. You don't need all of these, and you don't need to be a researcher.
Several organisations have already started here, from Catalyze and Resolution to Safe AI Netherlands. And there are still clear gaps, especially in European AI governance and in making the AI Act work in practice.
Talk to people already working on the problem. They may be better placed to do it, or become your first supporters. And talk to us: we can introduce you to founders in the Dutch AI safety community. Our founding guide covers testing an idea and setting up in the Netherlands.
Not everyone should found something. These are the other main ways to help, and the rest of this guide covers each one.
Shaping the laws, institutions and norms around AI, in government, regulators, standards bodies and think tanks. See part 4.
Good fit if you like writing, people and politics, and can wait years for results.
Research to make AI systems behave as intended and stay under human oversight. See part 5.
Good fit if you have, or can build, strong maths and machine learning skills.
Courses, communities and programmes that help more people do this work. See part 6.
Good fit if you're good with people and projects, and don't want to be a researcher.
AI safety organisations also need people in operations, management, communications and finance, and many of those roles need no technical background.
AI governance is about the norms, laws, institutions and politics that shape how AI is developed and used. Much of it happens in government, but companies, standards bodies, think tanks and civil society all play a part. This part focuses mainly on government policy.
In short
The US and China dominate AI development, but they aren't the only countries that matter. Middle powers such as the Netherlands, Canada, South Korea and Singapore can shape AI governance where the superpowers won't: by agreeing safety standards together, by building the expertise to test AI systems themselves, and, some argue, by making access to their combined markets depend on meeting those standards.
Finland shows what a small country can do. In September 2026, Finland's president and Norway's prime minister launched A Call for Control of Frontier AI Models. It asks for mandatory testing of frontier models before deployment, independent evaluation, shared reporting of serious incidents, and an international body that can set standards and check they're met. More than 20 leaders and the European Commission backed it, including Prime Minister Rob Jetten. Neither the US nor China signed.
The Netherlands is starting to move too. Its International AI Strategy (July 2026) commits to working with like-minded middle powers, exploring international governance of compute, seeking to join the international network of AI safety institutes, and exploring whether to set up a Dutch AI safety institute. In November 2026 the cabinet said it was studying an institute modelled on the UK's AI Security Institute, with advice due in December.
The next few years will bring new teams, mandates and diplomatic positions, and very few Dutch civil servants know much about the risks from frontier AI. If you do, a role at Foreign Affairs, Economic Affairs or a future Dutch AI safety institute could give you real influence.
A technical background, in machine learning, chips or computer science, can be very valuable. Most politicians and civil servants are generalists who rely on experts for technology they don't fully understand. If you can explain it clearly, you can be very useful.
You don't need to be an AI expert, though. Politics, public administration, law, international relations and economics are all good routes. A strong combination is a technical bachelor's followed by a master's in policy. You can also learn a lot on your own, for example through a free course (see part 6).
For jobs in the Netherlands, it doesn't matter much which Dutch university you go to. If you're aiming for Brussels, graduates from the College of Europe, Sciences Po and the London School of Economics have an edge.
Your first policy jobs are mostly about building career capital: a network, credibility and an understanding of how government works. Much of that carries over between roles, so a policy job that isn't about AI can still be a good first step.
Our jobs board lists AI safety roles you can do from the Netherlands.
Besides government itself, you could work at a think tank, a research organisation or an advocacy group. Some things to weigh up:
For government
Against government
Compute governance is about who gets access to the computing power needed to train the most capable AI systems. Those systems are trained on huge amounts of specialised hardware, which is easy to detect and comes from a very concentrated supply chain. That makes it one of the more practical levers for governing AI.
ASML is the only company that makes the EUV machines needed for the most advanced chips, so the Netherlands is a natural place for this work, and few Dutch or European civil servants understand chips or their supply chains in depth. A technical degree such as computer or electrical engineering helps a lot, but a good grasp of how chips are made and traded is also valuable. If you want to explore this, talk to us.
Joining a political party is one of the easiest ways to have an effect now and build career capital. It can take surprisingly little effort to influence a party's programme. You'll also learn to explain AI risks to people who know little about them, and to talk constructively with people who disagree. And you'll find out whether political work suits you.
Technical AI safety is research into making AI systems behave as intended and stay under meaningful human oversight. It happens at AI companies, nonprofits and universities, and among independent researchers. Research scientists come up with ideas, design experiments and analyse results; research engineers build, scale and run them. The line is blurry, but knowing which suits you helps you plan which skills to build.
In short
Machine learning and AI degrees are the most direct route. Data science, applied maths, physics, logic, philosophy, cognitive science and neuroscience can also produce strong safety researchers.
Surprisingly, a bachelor's in AI isn't always the best start. It may not give you the mathematical depth that demanding master's programmes expect, and much of it is repeated in the master's. Maths, physics or computer science often give a stronger foundation. Check what your target master's requires before you choose.
The University of Amsterdam is the clear leader in deep learning in the Netherlands, and its MSc Artificial Intelligence is our top recommendation. It gives you a strong technical grounding, with specialisations such as natural language processing, reinforcement learning and computer vision. Other universities may offer less depth but more freedom to choose courses.
Full-time technical safety jobs are scarce, even for very skilled people, and few are in the Netherlands. Some options:
You can also build a research career through self-study and independent projects, in your free time or with a grant. The Long-Term Future Fund and BlueDot Impact's career transition grants fund people doing this. It makes sense when nobody is working on the direction you find most promising, or to build skills between jobs. It's hard, though: there's no structure, so you need a lot of self-discipline. If your idea is bigger than one person, see part 2.
Building the field is a career path of its own: helping more talented people understand AI risk and find their way into the work. The programmes below are the result, and they're a good way in.
The easiest place to start is Safe AI Netherlands (SAIN). It grew out of the AI Safety Initiative Groningen and became a national foundation in 2026. It runs:
“The huge network I've gotten in contact with through EA has been amazing. I've made this pivot much, much faster than I think I could have accomplished in other comparable fields.”
A call with our team is free. We'll help you work out your next step and introduce you to people working on AI safety in the Netherlands.
We wrote the first version of this guide in 2023 with input and feedback from Jan-Willem van Putten, Tim Bakker, Leon Lang, Teun van der Weij, Sam Bogerd, Daan Juijn, Stan van Wingerden, Jesse Hoogland, Alexandra Bos, Jelle Donders, Marieke de Visscher and James Herbert. Thank you. Any mistakes in this update are ours.